β Test Review Checklist
# π§Ύ Test Review Checklist
## π Document/Item: [Test Plan / Test Case Suite / Test Report / Test Strategy]
## Reviewed By: [Reviewerβs Name]
## Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
## Version: [v1.0 / Draft / Final]
π General Completeness
- All test cases are written for documented requirements (linked to REQs)
- Document has a unique ID and version history
- Scope and objectives are clearly defined
- Test scenarios cover both positive and negative flows
- Test data requirements are defined or linked
π§ͺ Test Case Quality
- Each test case has a unique ID
- Test case title is clear and concise
- Steps are easy to follow and reproducible
- Expected results are clearly defined
- Actual result field is available for execution tracking
- Test case includes preconditions and test data where applicable
- Test cases avoid redundancy and duplication
- Edge cases and boundary conditions are considered
- Test cases are appropriately prioritized (High/Medium/Low)
π§ Technical & Functional Accuracy
- Test steps align with the actual application behavior
- Test cases reflect the current UI/API and business logic
- API tests include valid endpoints, methods, headers, and payloads
- Automation IDs (if applicable) are correctly tagged
- Security, performance, and accessibility are considered if relevant
π Maintainability & Reusability
- Test cases are modular and reusable
- Test data is parameterized (where possible)
- Reusable preconditions and setup steps are documented
- Automation compatibility (if applicable) is noted
π Review Process
- Reviewed by at least one peer or lead
- Review comments (if any) are addressed and resolved
- Versioning and change history updated
- Approval from QA Lead / Test Manager is documented
π Documentation Quality
- Formatting is consistent and clean
- All abbreviations and acronyms are explained
- Links to external systems (e.g., Jira, Confluence, TestRail) work
- Screenshots/mockups (if needed) are attached and labeled
- No spelling or grammar issues
π¦ Final Review Status
Criteria | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|
Overall Completeness | β Yes / β No | [Enter comments] |
Technical Accuracy | β Yes / β No | [Enter comments] |
Readiness for Execution | β Yes / β No | [Enter comments] |
Approval | β Approved / β³ Pending / β Rejected | [QA Lead Name] |
π Optional: Sign-Off
Reviewer Name | Role | Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|
A. Singh | QA Lead | 2025-03-24 | β Approved |
M. Gupta | QA Tester | 2025-03-24 | β Reviewed |
---
## π Quick Test Review Checklist Summary (Tabular)
| Area | Checklist Item | Status β
/β |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------|-------------|
| β
Requirements Coverage | All user stories mapped to test cases | |
| β
Functional Accuracy | Test reflects actual app behavior | |
| β
Edge Cases | Boundary & edge case coverage | |
| β
Priority Tagging | Priority (P1/P2/P3) is assigned | |
| β
Expected Results | Clearly mentioned for each test | |
| β
Reproducibility | Steps can be repeated by another tester | |
| β
Test Data Readiness | Defined or linked test data sets | |
| β
Linked Defects (if any) | Known issues are linked | |
| β
Review Completed | Signed off by reviewer | |